A market-monitoring stack for solo consultants: sources, filtering, digest
If you consult in a specific domain, part of your value is simply knowing what happened this week — which vendor changed pricing, which regulation moved, who got acquired. Clients assume you're on top of it. Staying on top of it, as one person, is a real time cost.
Here's a stack that covers it in about 15 minutes a week, and where the shortcut is if you'd rather not maintain it.
Step 1: Decide what you're actually monitoring
Be concrete. "The industry" is not a monitoring target. Write down:
- 3–6 companies — the vendors and competitors that come up in client conversations.
- 2–4 topics — "AI Overviews", "MiCA compliance", "outcome-based pricing" — phrased the way a headline would phrase them.
- 1–2 events you never want to miss — a specific competitor cutting prices, a regulatory deadline.
That list is the whole spec. Everything below is plumbing.
Step 2: Sources
Match the source type to what you're tracking.
| You're tracking | Best source |
|---|---|
| Company news, funding, acquisitions | Google News RSS query per company |
| Product / feature changes | The company blog RSS + changelog page |
| Pricing changes | The pricing page itself (no feed — needs change detection) |
| Topic / market shifts | 2–3 trade publications' RSS + a Google News topic query |
| Community signal | One well-chosen subreddit's RSS |
Practical notes:
- Google News RSS is underrated:
https://news.google.com/rss/search?q=YOUR+QUERY&hl=engives you a dated, structured feed for any query, free, no key. - Pricing and changelog pages rarely have feeds. This is the one place you need a change-detection tool (Visualping, Distill.io, or similar).
- Keep it to 15–30 sources. More than that and you're back to noise.
Step 3: Filtering
Raw feeds are ~70% noise: syndicated press releases, "top 10 alternatives" listicles, the same story from multiple outlets.
Minimum viable filter:
- Mute obvious noise keywords in your reader (Feedly, Inoreader): "alternatives", "vs", "review", "coupon".
- De-duplicate by hand as you skim — if you've seen the acquisition once, skip the other four.
- Ignore anything undated or older than a week.
This is the step that doesn't scale well. It's fine at 15 sources and a weekly cadence; it gets tedious daily.
Step 4: The digest
Once a week, block 15 minutes:
- Skim the filtered feeds.
- Pull the 5–10 items that matter into a note.
- For each, write one line: what happened + what it means for a client.
That second line is the entire point. "Semrush raised prices" is data. "Semrush raised prices, so your client's Q1 tooling budget needs revisiting and it's a reason to revisit the Ahrefs comparison" is consulting.
Optionally, run the raw items through ChatGPT or Claude with a standing prompt to draft the summaries — but you still have to supply the "what it means" context and check the output.
What this costs you
- Setup: 1–2 hours.
- Running it: ~15 min/week if you're disciplined, plus the occasional session fixing a broken feed.
- Tools: $0–14/month (change detection is the only thing that might cost).
That's genuinely workable. The failure mode isn't cost — it's that the weekly 15 minutes is the first thing to get skipped when you're busy, and three skipped weeks later you've missed something a client asks about.
The shortcut
We built EveBrief for exactly this: you give it the list from Step 1 in plain English, it runs Steps 2–4, and you get one briefing — grouped, deduplicated, each item with a "why it matters to you" line written against your stated interests. Plus an instant alert for the one or two events you flagged as never-miss.
It's the same stack, with the two annoying parts (the weekly filtering slog, and maintaining feeds) handled. Free tier for a weekly digest of 3 sources; $19/mo for the full thing.
Pre-launch — waitlist here, launch pricing locked in for early members.
One market briefing instead of 200 alerts — for boutique agencies and consultants.
Join the waitlist →